Cases 1 - 10 of 413
Hubert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04061
Plaintiff:
Michael Hubert
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
York v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Tonya York
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Minogue v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04227
Plaintiff:
Heidi L. Minogue
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rsReview of HHS Decision (RSI)
Santiago v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04179
Plaintiff:
Maritza Santiago
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Patterson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04167
Plaintiff:
Antuan Patterson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Clover v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Rachel Clover
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hnyda v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
william hnyda
Defendant:
Commissioner SSA Martin J. O'Malley
Other:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Searles v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
Hope Searles
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Bordonada v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04092
Plaintiff:
Lisette Bordonada
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Dion Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
