Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Law v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Trisha Law
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Law v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv01463
Plaintiff:
Paige Law
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Law-Kozlowski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Tiffany A. Law-Kozlowski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Laws v. Saul
as 1:2020cv04823
Plaintiff:
Danielle Laws
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Law-Kozlowski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00474
Plaintiff:
Tiffany A Law-Kozlowski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Law v. Colvin
as 6:2016cv06269
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Law
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Ratcliff v. Lighty
as 14-2010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Elijah W. Ratcliff, Agent
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Lighty, State Bar of Texas, Polk County, Texas and others
Ratcliff et al v. Lighty et al
as 1:2014cv03680
Plaintiff:
Elijah W. Ratcliff
Defendant:
Donald Lighty, Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, State Bar of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Purisima v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2013cv01068
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, CRST, Inc., Midlands Claim Administrators, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
MacLeay v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 10-2671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Scott MacLeay
Defendant - Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security, Marilyn D. Zahm, Administrative Law Judge and Dujuan E. Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
