Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Flight v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01275
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Peter N. Flight
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Updike v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Peter F Updike
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Peter John Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Romanyk v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peter Romanyk
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Peters v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Tanonia Peters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv01592
Plaintiff:
Joseph Peter Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Moschera v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv09236
Plaintiff:
Peter Raymond Moschera
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mares v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06666
Plaintiff:
Peter Anthony Mares
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Grollitsch v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01061
Plaintiff:
Peter C. Grollitsch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Peters v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
Nola M Peters
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
