Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Tyrrell v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Shane Anton Tyrrell
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley and Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Wulff v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01313
Plaintiff:
Shane Patrick Wulff
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01188
Plaintiff:
Shane Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mayers v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv04565
Plaintiff:
Shane Mayers
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dornheimer v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Shane Richard Dornheimer
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cook v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Shane Cook
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stumpf v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Shane William Stumpf
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cockle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00738
Plaintiff:
Shane Thomas Cockle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Uht v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv02143
Plaintiff:
Shane Francis Uht
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Fitzgerald v. Kijakazi
as 8:2021cv01065
Plaintiff:
Shane Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
