Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin Sullivan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
James Sullivan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sullivan v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Sullivan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Michael J Sullivan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv01012
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Sullivan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sullivan v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00636
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stanton Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00031
Plaintiff:
Brett Adam Sullivan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sullivan v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01632
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Holly Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv01440
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Bridget Ann Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sullivan v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00753
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Sullivan
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
