Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Rouse v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06264
Plaintiff:
Tamara Rouse
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Simmons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Sara Tamara Simmons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mines v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00955
Plaintiff:
Tamara Mines
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Younis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Tamarae H Younis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Suzon Tamara Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of SSA Decision SSID - SSI Disability Cases
Williams-Powell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tamara L. Williams-Powell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Tamara D. Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mack v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06359
Plaintiff:
Tamara Mack
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Doherty v. Saul
as 2:2021cv01051
Plaintiff:
Tamara Doherty and Tamara D Doherty
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01696
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tamara Williams and Tamara N. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
