Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 141 - 150 of 567
Martinez Roman v. Decker
as 20-3004
Petitioner / Appellant: Marco Martinez Roman
Respondent / Appellee: Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Open Society Justice Initiative v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2020cv06359
Defendant: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Food and Drug Administration and others
Plaintiff: Open Society Justice Initiative
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
State of New York v. United States Department of Ho We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2537
Defendant / Appellant: United States of America, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Catholic Charities Community Services, (Archidiocese of New York), Make the Road New York, City of New York and others
Petitioner: Immigration Reform Law Institute
Wang v. Cuccinelli II et al
as 1:2020cv06249
Plaintiff: Xueran Wang and Miranda Wang
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad Wolf, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Grant v. Decker
as 20-2739
Respondent: Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner: Dudley Grant
Graham v. Decker
as 20-2740
Respondent: Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security and Director Thomas R. Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of United States Immigrations & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner: Roland Graham
State of New York
as 20-2622
Defendant / Appellant: Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Acting Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of New York and Eric Gonzalez, Esq., in his official capacity as the District Attorney of Kings County (Brooklyn)
Quituizaca v. Barr
as 20-2700
Respondent: Michael Ball, SDDO, Jeffrey Searls, Facility Director Buffalo Federal Detention Center, Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner: Xavier Pucha Quituizaca
Ruddock v. Wolf
as 20-2140
Respondent / Appellee: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of the Executive Secretary and Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U. S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner / Appellant: Kevin Ruddock
State of New York v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05349
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew Albence and others
Plaintiff: State of New York
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?