Cases 11 - 18 of 18
United States of America v. Reeves (Derrick Franks)
as 17-1485
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edward Reeves, Eric Bolton, AKA E.B., William Bolton and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Derrick Franks, AKA Skills
Bolton v. Reed Elsevier Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05735
Plaintiff:
Jamon Bolton
Defendant:
Reed Elsevier Inc. , LexisNexis , Lexisnexis Risk Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Zrallack (DeFelice)
as 13-927
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kenneth Zrallack, Edwin T. Westmoreland, William R. Bolton and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Alexander DeFelice
United States of America v. Coplan (Bolton)
as 10-1716
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles Bolton
United States of America v. Coplan (Nissenbaum)
as 10-583
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
David L. Smith and Charles Bolton
Defendant - Appellant:
Martin Nissenbaum, Robert Coplan, Richard Shapiro and others
Bolton v. Proshares Trust et al
as 1:2009cv08200
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Bolton, Richard C. Bolton, Richard C. Bolton and others
Defendant:
Proshares Trust, Proshare Advisors LLC, SEI Investments Distribution Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Equal Rights Ctr et al v. Archstone-Smith Trust et al
as 3:2007mc00306
Plaintiff:
Equal Rights Ctr, American Assn of People with Disabilities and United Spinal Assn
Defendant:
Archstone-Smith Trust and Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Cross Defendant:
Niles Bolton Assoc, Inc
Cross Claimant:
Archstone-Smith Trust and Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Equal Rights Center et al v. Archstone-Smith Trust et al
as 1:2007mc00450
Plaintiff:
Equal Rights Center, American Association of People of Disabilities and United Spinal Association
Defendant:
Archstone-Smith Trust and Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Cross Defendant:
Niles Bolton Associates, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
