Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Florence v. Aphria Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11453
Defendant:
Aphria Inc., Carl Merton and Victor Neufeld
Plaintiff:
James Florence
Petitioner:
Jay Flanagan and Paul Carlisle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11376
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lead Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Carlisle (Flowers)
as 17-166
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Diondre Carlisle, AKA Slim Gz, Tyrone Smith, Gudda, Isaiah Washington, AKA Ah-ah and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Rakeem Flowers, AKA Ra ra
Baiul v. William Morris Agency, LLC
as 14-1837
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oksana S. Baiul
Defendant - Appellee:
William Morris Agency, LLC, FKA William Morris Agency, Inc., William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC, Sheldon Schultz and others
Baiul v. William Morris Agency, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv08683
Plaintiff:
Oksana Baiul
Defendant:
William Morris Agency, LLC , William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC , Sheldon Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carlisle v. Brown
as 13-4451
Petitioner:
Steven Carlisle
Respondent:
Edward E. Brown, Probation Director, Jefferson County
Yu et al v. Town of Southold et al
as 1:2010cv02943
Defendant:
Board of Trustees, Chief Carlisle Cochran, Jill M. Doherty and others
Justice:
Rudolph H. Bruer
Plaintiff:
Cheng Kai Yu Revocable Trust, Cheng Kai Yu and Hui Hui Yu
Bay Constable:
Andrew C. Epple, Jr.
Trustee:
James King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tarbell et al v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 6:2008mc00022
Petitioner:
Richard Tarbell and Verda Tarbell
Respondent:
United States Drug Enforcement Administration, DEA Special Agent Tim Sinnigen, St. Lawrence County Sheriffs Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
