Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen
as 18-1985
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, on behalf of itself, its members, its clients, and all similarly situated individuals, Antonio Alarcon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General and Donald J. Trump, President of the United States
Vidal v. Nielsen
as 18-1521
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, on behalf of itself, its members, its clients, and all similarly situated individuals, Antonio Alarcon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security and Jefferson B. Sessions III
Nielsen v. Vidal
as 18-1313
Petitioner:
Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General and Donald J. Trump, President of the United States
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, on behalf of itself, its members, its clients, and all similarly situated individuals, Antonio Alarcon and others
Guzman et al v. Hecht et al
as 1:2018cv03947
Plaintiff:
Francisco Guzman , Rosario Ayala , Manuel Flores Dominguez and others
Defendant:
Thomas T. Hecht , Leonard H. Hecht , Thomas T. Hecht, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Make the Road New York et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2018cv02445
Plaintiff:
Make the Road Connecticut and Make the Road New York
Defendant:
Office of the Secretary of Homeland Security, Office of the Attorney General, Office of the Solicitor General and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Vidal v. Nielsen
as 18-485
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, on behalf of itself, its members, its clients, and all similarly situated individuals, Antonio Alarcon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Amicus Curiae:
Citizens United, Citizens United Foundation, Public Advocate of the United States and others
In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
In Re: Elaine Duke
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
Movant:
6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated and others
Council on American-Islamic Relations - Connecticut et al v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2017cv01061
Plaintiff:
Council on American-Islamic Relations - Connecticut and Make the Road New York
Defendant:
US Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Department of State
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CONNECTICUT v. Make the Road New York et al
as 3:2017cv01060
Plaintiff:
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CONNECTICUT
Defendant:
Make the Road New York, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
