Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Air & Liquid Systems Corp et al v. Allianz Underwriters Insurance Co. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012mc00051
Plaintiff: Air & Liquid Systems Corp and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.
Defendant: Allianz Underwriters Insurance Co., Allstate Insurance Company, Assicurazioni Generali S.P.A. and others
Counter_claimant: Howden North America, Inc.
Cross_claimant: Howden North America, Inc.
Counter_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corp, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and others
Cross_defendant: Allianz Underwriters Insurance Co., Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Co., American Ins Co and others
Movant: General Reinsurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Various Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Stonebridge Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2011cv05852
Plaintiff: Various Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Defendant: Stonebridge Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 201
World Trade Farmers Market, In v. Burns International Services C We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-4197
Plaintiff: World Trade Farmers Market, Incorporated, Adem Arici, Omer Ipek and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Cedar & Washington Associates, LLC
Plaintiff - Appellee: Lauren Peters
Claimant: Ellen Mariani
Defendant - Appellee: American Airlines, Incorporated, Burns International Services Corporation, Burns International Security Services Corporation and others
In Re: September 11 Property D
as 10-3941
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs, Gary Michael Low, Michael Keating and others
Claimant: Ellen Mariani
Defendant: American Airlines, Incorporated, Burns International Services Corporation, Burns International Security Services Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee: Citigroup, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. HF09AAT1 v. Alto Air Freight Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv06112
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. HF09AAT1
Defendant: Alto Air Freight Inc. and Landstar System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
QBE International Insurance Lt v. AMR Corporation
as 10-3153
Plaintiff: QBE International Insurance Ltd. and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London as Members of Syndicates Numbered 1212, 1241, 79, 506, and 2791, as Subrogees and Assignees of Silverstein Properties, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellant: The WTC Plaintiffs
Defendant - Appellee: AMR Corporation, American Airlines, Inc., UAL Corporation and others
In Re: September 11 Property We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2970
Plaintiff: World Trade Farmers Market, Inc., Adem Arici, Omer Ipek and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Lauren Peters
Claimant - Appellant: Ellen Mariani
Defendant - Appellee: American Airlines, Inc., Burns International Services Corp., Burns International Security Services Corp. and others
Stonebridge Casualty Insurance Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
as 1:2010cv04585
Petitioner: Stonebridge Casualty Insurance Company
Respondent: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 201
Crucible Materials Corporatio v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd
as 10-1321
Petitioner: Crucible Materials Corporation
Respondent: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and London Market Companies
Defendant: Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Excess Insurance Company Limited, Minster Insurance Company Limited and others
In Re: September 11 Property
as 10-1186
Plaintiff: World Trade Farmers Market, Inc., Adem Arici, Omer Ipek and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Lauren Peters
Claimant - Appellant: Ellen Mariani
Defendant - Appellee: American Airlines, Inc., Burns International Services Corp., Burns International Security Services Corp. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?