Cases 21 - 30 of 364
United States of America v. Owens
as 23-6397
Defendant:
ROBERT WALKER, T.O. and PRINCE SMITH
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE OWENS and Reeski
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Jackson
as 23-6281
Defendant:
AMAR SCOTT, YULANDER GREEN, JERRICK DENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JACKSON, Boosum and Boots
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Walker v. Provention Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02574
Plaintiff:
Martin Walker
Defendant:
Provention Bio, Inc., Ashleigh Palmer, Avery Catlin and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell, Elaine Wang, Catherine Coffman and others
The New York Times Company et al v. Department of Defense
as 1:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company and Mark Walker
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Rabin et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Norman C. Rabin, Catherine E. Ryan, Lisa R. Walker and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gervat v. Dorsey et al
as 1:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Jack Dorsey, Amrita Ahuja, Roelof Botha and others
Nominal Defendant:
Block, Inc. and Square, Inc.
Zeitouni v. Dorsey et al
as 1:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Neil Zeitouni
Defendant:
Jack Dorsey, Roelof Botha, Amy Brooks and others
Nominal Defendant:
Block, Inc.
Rubin v. Dorsey et al
as 1:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Defendant:
Jack Dorsey, Roelof Botha, Amy Brooks and others
Nominal Defendant:
Block, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
