Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,635
Weiss v. Diamondback Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02689
Plaintiff: Steven Weiss
Defendant: Diamondback Energy, Inc., Travis D. Stice, Vincent K. Brooks and others
Shelton v. Priority Concepts Inc.
as 2:2024cv02581
Plaintiff: James E. Shelton
Defendant: Priority Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cunny v. Bell
as 24-864
Petitioner: CHARLES CUNNY
Respondent: E. BELL, Superintendent
Tubbs v. Venettozzi
as 24-841
Plaintiff: DARNELL TUBBS
Defendant: DONALD G. UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, PAUL P. WOODRUFF, Deputy Superintendent of Security at Upstate Correctional Facility, WAYNE GARLAND, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff: JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant: FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Cohen v. Tepper et al
as 2:2024cv02460
Plaintiff: Martin Leonard Cohen
Defendant: Stanley H. Tepper, Alan R. Tepper, Walter A. Koprowski and others
Interested Party: US Attorney for the E. District of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-819
Defendant: GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff: JAY BRADSHAW
Weiss v. Kaman Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00512
Plaintiff: Steven Weiss
Defendant: Kaman Corporation, Aisha M. Barry, A. William Higgins and others
Interested Party: Matthew Jones
Jones v. Kaman Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00513
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Defendant: Kaman Corporation, Aisha M. Barry, A. WILLIAMS HIGGINS and others
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-761
Plaintiff: DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RANDALL E. GARVER and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?