Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv05708
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Walgreen CO and The Kroger Co.
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo International PLC, PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv05603
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation , Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018cv04361
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Drogueria Betances, LLC, H-E-B LP, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc., Turlock Irrigation District and UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund
Respondent:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., OptumRX, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Caremark PHC, LLC and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01900
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Generics Inc., U.S.A., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Health and Welfare Fund v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01216
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Health and Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund v. Endo International PLC et al
as 1:2017cv02355
Plaintiff:
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Endo International PLC, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00980
Plaintiff:
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc., Heritage Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01039
Plaintiff:
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cesar Castillo, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Defendant:
Actavis Elizabeth, LLC , Breckenridge Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Heritage Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02516
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
In Re:
Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, Operating Engineers Local 312 Health and Welfare Trust, A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Buildings Trade Welfare Plan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company
Claimant:
Lonny DiTella
Interested Party:
Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc., PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc., Aetna Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Generic Pharmaceutical Association
Cause Of Action: MDL 2516 In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
