Cases 41 - 49 of 49
United States of America v. Meregildo (Pierce)
as 13-3687
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joshua Meregildo, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Killa, Melvin Colon, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, AKA Melly, Nolbert Miranda, AKA Sealed Defendant 4, AKA PayDay and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Earl Pierce, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, AKA Skeet Box
United States of America v. Jone
as 12-640
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jean Marie Phillips, Cheryl Barber, Ivan Stelzer and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Samuel Jeffrey Jones
Miller v. City of Ithaca, New York et al
as 6:2011mc06018
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller
Defendant:
City of Ithaca, New York, Edward Vallely, John Barber and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barber v. State of New York
as 11-427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tracey Barber
Defendant / Appellee:
State of New York, Office of the Attorney General, Civil Rights Bureau, Steuben County, District Attorney, Walmart and others
Barber et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
as 6:2010cv06420
Plaintiff:
Craig Barber and Melissa Barber
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. v. The Spot Barber Shop et al
as 1:2007cv08075
Plaintiff:
Garden City Boxing Club, Inc.
Defendant:
The Spot Barber Shop and Michael A. Febles
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984
Atkins et al v. Apollo Real Estate Advisors L.P. et al
as 1:2005cv04365
Plaintiff:
Janet B. Ruben, David T. Atkins, Anthony A. Abbazio and others
Defendant:
Apollo Real Estate Advisors L.P., Winthrop Financial Associates, GFB-AS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
