Cases 41 - 50 of 2,309
Owen v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
DeAnn Owen
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Lawrence S. Hershfield, Peter R. Ingram and others
Cardwell v. Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
as 24-606
Plaintiff:
KALOMA CARDWELL
Defendant:
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP, THOMAS REID, JOHN BICK and others
Smith v. Hochul
as 24-575
Plaintiff:
KEN SMITH
Defendant:
KATHY HOCHUL, Governer of New York, DANIEL F. MARTUSCELLO, Commissioner of DOCCS and MOLLY WASOW PARKS, Commissioner of DDS/DHS
Tigre Lucero v. Garland
as 24-477
Petitioner:
DANIEL ANDRES TIGRE LUCERO, PAOLA MARISOL CAJAMARCA CAJAMARCA and ASHLEY DANIELA TIGRE CAJAMARCA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Roy v. Narayen et al
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, John Murphy, Daniel Durn and others
United States of America v. Constantinescu (Mircea Constantinescu)
as 24-439
Defendant:
NIKOLAOS LIMBERATOS, CRISTIAN COSTEA, ALIN HANES CALUGARU and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Rivera-Figueroa (Andino)
as 24-431
Defendant:
CESAR RIVERA-FIGUEROA, JENHSEN RODRIGUEZ, DANIEL NAVARRO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stephenson v. Davis
as 24-414
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STEPHENSON, (Class of One, Pro-se Petitioner)
Defendant:
CARLENE DAVIS, (D.O.C. Counselor Supervisor), ANGEL QUIROS, (Commissioner-Conn. Dept of Correction, BARONE, (Warden, MacDougall State Prison) and others
Kaiser v. StubHub, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Kaiser
Defendant:
StubHub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hakimyar et al v. Habib Bank Limited
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Karim Hakimyar, Zara Karim, S.K. and others
Defendant:
Habib Bank Limited
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
