Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv05269
Plaintiff:
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04563
Plaintiff:
The City of Philadelphia
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and others
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In re: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016md02704
Defendant:
Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Genesee County Employees' Retirement System, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund Of Chicago and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Triangle T Partners, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Tradition America LLC, Tullett Prebon Americas Corporation and tpSEF, Inc.
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Petitioner:
Lawrence W. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re SSA Bonds Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016cv03711
Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement System, Alaska Department of Revenue, Treasury Division, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A, Gary McDonald, BNP Paribas and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100 and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
The Police Retirement System of St. Louis, City of Atlanta Firefighters Pension Fund, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
T-3 Restaurants, Inc. v. NFL Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2015cv09443
Plaintiff:
T-3 Restaurants, Inc.
Defendant:
NFL Enterprises LLC, Arizona Cardinals Holdings, Inc., Atlanta Falcons Football Club LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Pit Boss, Inc. et al v. National Football League, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09165
Plaintiff:
Pit Boss, Inc. , Draught Inc. , T-3 Restaurants, Inc. and others
Defendant:
National Football League, Inc., NFL Enterprises LLC, Arizona Cardinals Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Dassa v. National Football League, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08982
Plaintiff:
Steven Dassa
Defendant:
National Football League, Inc., NFL Enterprises LLC, Arizona Cardinals Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City of Philadelphia et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv08557
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia and Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Trilogy Holding, LLC et al v. National Football League, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08188
Plaintiff:
Trilogy Holding, LLC , New Lounge 4324, LLC , Pedal Haus Brewery, LLC and others
Defendant:
National Football League, Inc., NFL Enterprises LLC, Arizona Cardinals Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Deangelis v. Corzine
as 14-1249
Plaintiff:
Virginia Retirement System, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta, Joseph Deangelis, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bearing Fund LP, Summit Trust Company, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Kay P. Tee, LLC and others
Appellant:
Rogers Varner, Jr.
Movant - Appellant:
Paradigm Global Fund I Ltd., Paradigm Equities Ltd., Paradigm Asia Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Sumit Advani, Timothy Mundt, Bradley I. Abelow and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Henri J. Steenkamp, PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP, Michael G. Stockmand and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
