Cases 51 - 59 of 59
The State of Texas et al v. Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06625
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas , The State of Connecticut , The State of Ohio and others
Defendant:
Hachette Book Group, Inc., Harpercollins Publishers, LLC, Simon & Schuster, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Electronic Books Antitr
as 12-2999
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Shilpa Grover, Fredric A. Press, Anthony Petru and others
Defendant:
MacMillian, Inc, Harpercollins Publishers, Random House Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Penguin Group USA, Inc.
The State of Texas et al v. Penguin Group (USA) Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03394
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas , The State of Connecticut , The State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Simon & Schuster, Inc. , Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Grand River Enterprises Six Na v. Pryor
as 12-840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Limited
Defendant - Appellee:
Troy King, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity, Talis Colberg, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, and is sued herein solely, in his official, representative capacity, Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity and others
United States of America, et al v. Omnicare, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00275
Plaintiff:
The State of North Carolina , The State of Tennessee , The State of Nevada and others
Defendant:
Pharmerica Corp. , Neighborcare, Inc. , Omnicare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America, ex rel, et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 1:2011cv08196
Plaintiff:
United States Of America , State of California , State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Interpleader_plaintiff:
State of Washington
Intervenor_plaintiff:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 False Claims Act - Civil Actions
Grand River Enterprises Six Na v. Pryor
as 11-1904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Limited
Defendant - Appellee:
Troy King, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity, Talis Colberg, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, and is sued herein solely, in his official, representative capacity, Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity and others
United States Of America v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 1:2011cv00071
Plaintiff:
the State of Indiana, the State of Georgia, the State of New Jersey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. and DEF
Intervenor Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Respondent:
Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP
Petitioner:
Patrick A. Klingman
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 8:2008cv05606
Plaintiff:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. , Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc. , Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Stephen L. Johnson
Intervenor_defendant:
City of New York , City and County of Denver, by and through its Board of Water Commissioners , Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
State Of New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Washingon
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Miccosukee Tribe Of Indians Of Florida , Friends of the Everglades , Florida Wildlife Federation and others
Interpleader_defendant:
Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
