Cases 61 - 70 of 107
Yan v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2010cv04331
Plaintiff:
Lin Yan
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano , Michael Aytes , Gerard Heinaur and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Miah v. Holder
as 10-2065
Petitioner:
Mujib Miah, AKA Faizur Rahman
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General, John Morton, Assistant Secretary, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Christopher Shanahan, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, New York District, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Tsamcho v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2010cv02029
Defendant:
Gerard Heinauer, Alejandro Mayorkas, Janet Napolitano and others
Plaintiff:
Lhakpa Tsamcho
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lopez Villavicencio v. Holder
as 10-1308
Petitioner:
Carlos Leonardo Lopez Villavicencio
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General and Janet Napolitano, Secretary of United States Department of Homeland Security
The New York Times Company v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2010cv02656
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security and Janet Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wang v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2010cv02576
Plaintiff:
Kong Hui Wang
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano , Alejandro Mayorkas , Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lin v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2010cv01571
Plaintiff:
Mei Zhen Lin
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano , Alejandro Mayorkas , Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guo v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2010cv01060
Plaintiff:
Guo Wen Guo
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano , Alejandro Mayorkas , Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-636
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
