Cases 71 - 80 of 491
Maradiaga v. Decker
as 21-1184
Respondent:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Tae Johnson, in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Javier Castillo Maradiaga
Jimenez v. Decker
as 21-1188
Respondent:
Sheriff Carl E. Dubois, Sheriff, Orange County, Merrick B. Garland, Acting U.S. Attorney General, Thomas Decker, Director, New York Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Salomon Aparicio Jimenez
Garcia v. Decker
as 21-1109
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas Decker, Director, New York Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Sheriff Carl E. Dubois, Sheriff, Orange County, Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mario Rene Garcia
Madej Manchanda v. Lewis
as 21-1088
Defendant / Appellee:
Susan Quintana, New York USCIS Field Office Director, Does 1-5, Andrea Lewis, Immigration Services Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rahul Manchanda and Sylwia Ewelina Madej Manchanda
Defendant:
Immigration Services Officer Lewis
Gill et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2021cv02363
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Acting Director Kenneth Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Waqas Ahmad Gill and Maria Amir
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Saleh v. Pastore
as 21-1073
Defendant / Appellee:
Gina Pastore, as Brooklyn Field Office Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice, Lee Bowes, as Acting Field Office Director, Northeast Region, USCIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tarek Youssef Hassan Saleh
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Garland
as 21-1044
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Teran Rivera v. Searls
as 21-1035
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Customs Enforcement, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, of the United States, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Facility Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, NY and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Roberto Carlos Teran Rivera
Santos-Torres v. Houghton et al.
as 1:2021cv03210
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Timothy J. Houghton and others
Plaintiff:
Sandro Yobani Santos-Torres
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101
P.L. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E
as 21-825
Plaintiff:
J.C., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R.F.J., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, P.L., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, A.Q., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Director Thomas R. Decker, Director of New York Field Office of ICE, in official capacity, Director Matthew Albence, Director Matthew T. Albence Executive Associate Director of ICE Enforcement Removal Operations, in official capacity, Daniel J. Daugherty and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
