Cases 71 - 80 of 5,636
Gervat v. Freda et al
as 1:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Fabrizio Freda, Ronald S. Lauder, Leonard A. Lauder and others
United States of America v. Hicks (Wayne Hicks)
as 24-951
Defendant:
WAYNE HICKS, BRIAN THOMAS, JORDAN WOODBINE and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cleary v. Austin Lloyd, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01662
Plaintiff:
William Kevin Cleary
Defendant:
Austin Lloyd, Inc., Austin Coins, Inc., Eric P Lesak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Echevarria (Simmons)
as 24-938
Defendant:
NAQUANN SIMMONS, TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ramirez v. Keyser
as 24-918
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY RAMIREZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM F. KEYSER, Supt. of Sullivan Correctional Facility
United States of America v. Artis (Campbell)
as 24-922
Defendant:
MALIK CAMPBELL, SOLOMON ARTIS, LEONARD BARLETTO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Velez (Garcia)
as 24-923
Defendant:
JONATHAN GARCIA, CARMELO VELEZ, CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-900
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-904
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Encarnacion v. Collado
as 24-911
Defendant:
VITARIUS, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Vitarious, OLIVO, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
BERNABE ENCARNACION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
