Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-317
Petitioner: AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent: ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-238
Petitioner: AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent: ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
In Re: American Express Anti-S We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1766
Plaintiff: National Supermarkets Association, Inc., on behalf of its membership, and all other similarly situated persons, Clam Lake Partners LLC, James Eaton and others
Intervenor: Gander Mountain Company, Circuit City Liquidating Trust, Holiday Companies and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Qwik Lube LLC and LaJolla Auto Tech, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc,
Defendant: Susan Burdette
In Re: American Express Anti-S
as 20-580
Plaintiff: National Supermarkets Association, Inc., on behalf of its membership, and all other similarly situated persons, Clam Lake Partners LLC, James Eaton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Cohen Rese Gallery, Inc., Lopez-Dejonge, Inc., Jasa, Inc., on behalf of themselves and others
Intervenor: Circuit City Liquidating Trust, Gander Mountain Company, Holiday Companies and others
Defendant / Appellee: American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc, and American Express Company
Defendant: Susan Burdette
Oliver et al v. American Express Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00566
Plaintiff: David Moskowitz, Michael Thomas Reid, Nate Thayer and others
Defendant: American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. and American Express Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Amend et al v. American Express Company et al
as 1:2015cv03554
Plaintiff: Andrew Amend, Susan Burdette, Zachary Draper and others
Defendant: American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America v. American Express Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1672
Plaintiff: State of Hawaii
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America, State of Maryland, State of Missouri and others
Defendant: Mastercard International Incorporated and Visa Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: Joseph Gregory Sidak, Esq., Robert D Willig, David J Teece and others
Movant: Home Depot USA, Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc., Academy, Ltd., DBA Academy Sports + Outdoors and others
United States of America v. American Express Company
as 15-1672
Amicus Curiae: Michael A. Carrier, Law Professor, Bridgestone Americas Inc., Nestle Waters North America Inc. and others
Petitioner: Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Saks Incorporated, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Ohio and others
Defendant / Appellant: American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. and American Express Company
Defendant: Visa Inc. and Mastercard International Incorporated
Plaintiff: State of Hawaii
Tiemann v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02507
Defendant: American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Maryli Tiemann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
O'Keefe et al
as 1:2015cv01910
Defendant: American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shawn O'Keefe, Michael Thomas Reid and Francisco Robleto, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?