Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cardwell v. Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
as 24-606
Plaintiff:
KALOMA CARDWELL
Defendant:
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP, THOMAS REID, JOHN BICK and others
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Counter Claimant:
Clairol, Incorporated, Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., Rockwell International Corporation and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, United States Department of the Air Force, Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Colonial Pipeline Company, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, United States Navy and others
Plaintiff:
DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Appellant:
Revere Copper Products, Inc., AKA Revere Copper & Brass Incorporated
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Quanta Resource Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Clairol, Incorporated, Basf Corporation, Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. and others
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Paribas North America
Third-Party-Defendant:
EQ Northeast, Inc., AKA Franklin Environmental Services, Inc., FKA Franklin Pumping Service, Coastal Oil New York, Inc, Alcan Aluminum Corporation, AKA Alcan Sheet & Plate and others
Defendant:
Carl A. Capasso, Darling International, Inc., Russell W. Mahler and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Lewis Brass and Copper Company v. ABF Freight System, Inc.
as 1:2013cv03251
Counter Claimant:
ABF Freight System, Inc.
Defendant:
ABF Freight System, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Lewis Brass and Copper Company
Plaintiff:
Lewis Brass and Copper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
State of New York v. Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
as 13-132
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
State of New York
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Olin Corporation, Mader Capital Corp., 3163 Buffalo Avenue Corporation and others
Third-Party-Defendant:
United States of America, Occidental Chemical Corporation, The City of Niagara Falls, New York and others
Defendant:
Recochem
Defendant - Appellee:
Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
State of New York v. Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
as 13-148
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
State of New York
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Mader Capital Corp., 3163 Buffalo Avenue Corporation and Corigan Sanoian, Individually and d/b/a Quad Technologies
Third-Party-Plaintiff - Appellant:
Olin Corporation
Third-Party-Defendant:
United States of America, Occidental Chemical Corporation, The City of Niagara Falls, New York and others
Defendant:
Recochem and E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
Defendant - Appellee:
Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
United States of America v. Bra
as 12-3179
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Robin Bruhjell Brass
David Peyser Sportswear Inc et al v. Spectrum Brands Inc et al
as 1:2010cv06108
Plaintiff:
David Peyser Sportswear Inc , National Liability and Fire Insurance Company , Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, et al. and others
Defendant:
Spectrum Brands Inc , John Doe, John Doe II and others
Cross_claimant:
Spectrum Brands Inc
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Rane Corporation , C2F Inc. , National Industrial Concepts, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
BYD Company Limited
Miscellaneou:
Air Express International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of New York v. Solvent Chemical
as 10-2383
Plaintiff:
State of New York
Third-Party-Defendant:
United States of America, Occidental Chemical Corporation, The City of Niagara Falls, New York and others
Defendant:
ICC Industries, Inc., Mader Capital Corp., 3163 Buffalo Avenue Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Olin Corporation and E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
