Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Smith v. Ebanks
as 24-1097
Not Yet Classified:
AHTWANA SMITH and LAKUAN EBANKS
Defendant:
ROC NATION LLC, CEO Desiree Perez, REFORM ALLIANCE, CEO Robert Rooks, DAMON DASH and others
Freeman v. Sansom
as 24-668
Plaintiff:
LISA FREEMAN
Defendant:
SCOTT SANSOM, Chief of Police, JOSEPH FICACELLI, Police Lieutenant and TOWN OF EAST HARTFORD
McNary v. Santos et al
as 1:2024cv01736
Plaintiff:
Jason McNary
Defendant:
Alex Santos, Jennifer Arriaga and J'Myah Freeman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Khamidullin v. Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09213
Plaintiff:
Damir Khamidullin
Defendant:
Blue Apron Holdings, Inc., Jennifer Carr-Smith, Beverly K. Carmichael and others
Mind Medicine (MINDMED) Inc. v. Freeman et al
as 1:2023cv07875
Plaintiff:
Mind Medicine (MINDMED) Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Freeman, Jake Freeman, Chad Boulanger and others
United States of America v. Freeman
as 23-6394
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODGER FREEMAN
In re: Nestle Waters North America Inc
as 3:2023mc00009
Respondent:
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP
Petitioner:
Nestle Waters North America Inc.
Intervenor:
Mark J. Patane, et al.
United States of America v. Westbrook
as 23-6046
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RICO L. FREEMAN, DARIUS DIX, COREY BRADBERRY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RAMONE WESTBROOK
Freeman v. Stake.com et al
as 1:2022cv07002
Plaintiff:
Christopher Freeman
Defendant:
Stake.com, Primedice, Edward Craven and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
United States of America v. Appiedu (Asante)
as 22-1474
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Farouk Appiedu, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Celvin Freeman, AKA Sealed Defendant 3 and Lord Aning, AKA Sealed Defendant 4
Defendant / Appellant:
Fred Asante, AKA Sealed Defendant 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
