Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Chicas-Martinez v. Garland
as 24-1374
Petitioner:
DENIA ISABEL CHICAS-MARTINEZ and CESIA MARIA VILLATORO-CHICAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zavala v. Garland
as 24-496
Petitioner:
SANTOS GLADYS ZAVALA and MARINA ISABEL ZAVALA-ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lala-Tenelema v. Garland
as 23-7854
Petitioner:
ELENA ISABEL LALA-TENELEMA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pucuna Yupa v. Garland
as 23-7647
Petitioner:
FELIPE JOSE PUCUNA YUPA, BLANCA ISABEL YUNGAN-CHULLI and ADRIAN JADIEL PUCUNA YUNGAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Buch v. Asuncion Aramburuzabala Larregui et al
as 1:2023cv08854
Plaintiff:
Cathy Buch
Defendant:
Maria Asuncion Aramburuzabala Larregui, Beatrice Ballini, Joachim Creus and others
Kelly et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2023cv07283
Plaintiff:
Danielle Kelly, Thomas Kelly, Andrew C. Kelly and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Mendez Dominguez v. Garland
as 22-6519
Petitioner:
ISABEL MENDEZ DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reyes v. Small Business Administration et al
as 1:2022cv06765
Plaintiff:
Ismael A. Reyes
Defendant:
Small Business Administration, Isabel Guzman, Janet Yellen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 636 Small Business Act - Aid to small business
Hyndman v. Small Business Administration et al
as 7:2022cv04973
Plaintiff:
Dante Hayndman and Dante Hyndman
Defendant:
Small Business Administration, Isabel Guzman, Janet Yellen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Honickman v. Blom Bank SAL
as 22-1039
Plaintiff:
Arie Miller
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michal Honickman, Individually and for the Estate of Howard Goldstein, Eugene Goldstein, Lorraine Goldstein and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Blom Bank SAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
