Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Andersen v. British Airways (BA) PLC
as 22-850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lauren Andersen
Defendant / Appellee:
British Airways (BA) PLC, Mr. Anthony Battista, Esq., Three John and Jane Doe BA employees and others
Andersen v. British Airways (BA) PLC
as 22-807
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lauren Andersen
Defendant / Appellee:
British Airways (BA) PLC, Mr. Anthony Battista, Esq., Three John and Jane Doe BA employees and others
Andersen v. British Airways (BA) PLC et al
as 2:2022cv01594
Plaintiff:
Lauren Andersen
Defendant:
British Airways (BA) PLC, Mr. Anthony Battista, Esq., Three John and Jane Doe BA employees and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Andersen v. British Airways (BA) PLC et al
as 1:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Lauren Andersen
Defendant:
British Airways (BA) PLC, Mr. Anthony Battista, Esq., Three John and Jane Doe BA employees and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Goonewardena v. North Shore Long Island Jewish
as 13-1578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Prasanna W. Goonewardena
Defendant - Appellee:
North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System, Zuker Hillside Hospital, Ludmila P. Dashevsky, Psychiatrist and others
In Re: Prasanna Goonewardena
as 12-798
Petitioner:
Prasanna W. Goonewardena
Respondent:
North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Ludmila P. Dashevsky, Psychiatrist and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-500
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02456
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
