Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Williams et al v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2023cv07190
Plaintiff:
Jaime Williams, Joann Ariola, David M. Carr and others
Defendant:
State Of New York, Kathy Hochul, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Nieves v. The New York City Health and H
as 21-2703
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Nieves
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Dr. Daniel Mundy, Director of Manhattan Forensic Psychiatric Court Clinic, Jonathan Weiss, M.D. and others
Accardi et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2021cv06247
Plaintiff:
Jill Accardi, Alice V. Alexander, Theresa Allegretta and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Sidoli v. Nio Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03188
Defendant:
Louis T. Hsieh, TUNG-JUNG HSIEH, NIO Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Raam Muthusamy, Babulal Tarapara, Gary Leung and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Sidoli
Sotheby's Inc. v. R.W. Chandler, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv09043
Plaintiff:
Sotheby's Inc.
Defendant:
R.W. Chandler, LLC, Robert Simon Fine Art, Inc., Six Hamilton, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
In Re: World Trade Center Disa
as 12-3254
Plaintiff:
Marion S. Mishkin Law Office, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks, Kathleen Carty, Yajaira Strohl and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tier 4 Plaintiffs
Appellant:
WTC Captive Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc. and others
Cross Appellant:
Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP
Defendant / Appellant:
Berkel & Company, Contractors, Inc., Diamond Point Excavating Corp., E. J. Davies, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
United States District Court Eastern District of New York
In Re: World Trade Center Disa
as 12-3254
Plaintiff:
Marion S. Mishkin, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks, Kathleen Carty, Yajaira Strohl and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Tier 4 Plaintiffs
Appellant:
WTC Captive Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Incorporated and others
Cross-Appellant:
Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP and Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo P.C.
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
AMEC Construction Management, Incorporated, AMEC Earth & Environmental, Incorporated, Evergreen Recycling of Corona and others
In Re: World Trade Center Disa
as 12-3186
Plaintiff:
Marion S. Mishkin, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks, Kathleen Carty, Yajaira Strohl and others
Defendant:
City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Incorporated and others
Cross-Appellant:
Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP and Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo P.C.
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
AMEC Construction Management, Incorporated, AMEC Earth & Environmental, Incorporated, Evergreen Recycling of Corona and others
In Re: World Trade Center Disa
as 12-3185
Plaintiff:
Marion S. Mishkin Law Office, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks, Kathleen Carty, Yajaira Strohl and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tier 4 Plaintiffs
Appellant:
WTC Captive Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Tully Construction Company, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States District Court Eastern District of New York
In Re: World Trade Center Disa
as 12-3185
Plaintiff:
Marion S. Mishkin, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks, Kathleen Carty, Yajaira Strohl and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Tier 4 Plaintiffs
Appellant:
WTC Captive Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AMEC Construction Management, Incorporated, AMEC Earth & Environmental, Incorporated, Evergreen Recycling of Corona and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
