Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Burrell v. Bell
as 24-1390
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
EARL BELL, Superintendent CCF, WEBB, Education Supervisor of CCF, KING, Deputy Superintendent of Programs and others
The Trustees of the New York State Nurses Association Pension Plan v. White Oak Global Advisors, LLC
as 24-1280
Plaintiff:
THE TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK STATE NURSES ASSOCIATION PENSION PLAN
Defendant:
WHITE OAK GLOBAL ADVISORS, LLC
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy of Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
1199SEIU National Benefit Fund et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
1199SEIU National Benefit Fund, 1199SEIU Greater New York Benefit Fund, 1199SEIU National Benefit Fund for Home Care Workers and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1101
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
MICHELLE BIELA, SANTORO, HENRY MUSHI and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
STEDMAN, Nurse, KATHRYN CARHART, Nurse, RALPH, Nurse and others
Rosa v. Doe
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Commissioner, JOHN DOE, Warden, VIKI S. BLUMBERG, Medical Doctor and others
Rene v. Mustafa
as 24-936
Plaintiff:
DIANA RENE and BELLS NURSES REGISTRY & EMPLOYMENT AGENCY INC.
Defendant:
M.D. TANZIA MUSTAFA, personally, M.D. EJIKE ONUOGU, personally, M.D. TAHIRA N. SIAL, personally and others
Not Yet Classified:
BRUNSWICK HOSPITAL CENTER, INC.
Gibbs v. Utilization Review Committee
as 24-891
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIBBS
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDUS, Dr., PILLAI, Dr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
