Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Edmondson et al v. Raniere et al
as 1:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Lauren Salzman, Dr. Danielle Roberts, Kathy Russell and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Toni Natalie, Jane Doe and others
Interested Party:
Chakravorty Suneel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bey v. Antoine et al
as 1:2019cv01877
Defendant:
Joe Morgano, Esq., Renee Pinkney, K. Saunders and others
Plaintiff:
Empress Hadiya Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Padilla v. Credit Protection Association
as 1:2018cv01333
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Padilla
Defendant:
Credit Protection Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jacana Holdings I LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 1:2016cv04702
Plaintiff:
Jacana Holdings I LLC , Jacana Holdings II LLC , Jacana Holdings III LLC and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico , Alejandro Garcia Padilla, Juan Zaragoza Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uriburu, Cecilia Maria v. Ibanez Padilla, Diego
as 1:2012mc00100
Plaintiff:
Uriburu, Cecilia Maria
Defendant:
Ibanez Padilla, Diego
Cause Of Action: M 10-7 Letters Rogatory - Argentina
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Padilla et al
as 1:2011cv03763
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Wilma Ortiz, Fabian Padilla and Prime Tyme Sports Bar & Lounge
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Gray v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03039
Defendant:
Esq. Lynn Ameleh, Lawrence Becker, Aderemi Bello and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Simpson Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
