Cases 1 - 10 of 1,871
Oparaji v. Home Retention Corp.
as 24-1444
Plaintiff:
MAURICE OPARAJI
Defendant:
HOME RETENTION CORP., BORCHERT AND LASPINA, PC, ROBERT W. FROMMER and others
Anderson v. DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04072
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Anderson
Defendant:
DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., Stanley Jaworski, Richard Bravman and others
United States of America v. Williams (Davis)
as 24-1425
Defendant:
RONALD GLEN DAVIS, TERRENCE WILLIAMS, ALAN ANDERSON and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Smith
as 24-1384
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1337
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State of New York et al v. A.O. Smith Corporation
as 6:2024cv06298
Plaintiff:
State of New York, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Sean Mahar
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Buczek v. Seterus, LLC
as 24-1143
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH A. BUCZEK
Defendant:
SETERUS, LLC, sometimes also assuming the alias of PHH Mortgage, JOHN DOES, said names being fictitious parties intended being possible corporations and/or individuals known or yet to be known involved in any way with this case as Defendants, JANE DOES, said names being fictitious parties intended being possible corporations and/or individuals known or yet to be known involved in any way with this case as Defendants and others
Smith v. Ebanks
as 24-1097
Not Yet Classified:
AHTWANA SMITH and LAKUAN EBANKS
Defendant:
ROC NATION LLC, CEO Desiree Perez, REFORM ALLIANCE, CEO Robert Rooks, DAMON DASH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
