Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Handiaz v. SharpSpring, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06816
Plaintiff:
Daniel Handiaz
Defendant:
SharpSpring, Inc., Richard A. Carlson, Steven A. Huey and others
Wilhelm v. SharpSpring, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06804
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
SharpSpring, Inc., Steven A. Huey, Richard A. Carlson and others
Lessard v. SharpSpring, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06602
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Lessard
Defendant:
SharpSpring, Inc., Rick Carlson, Steven Huey and others
Lavery v. SharpSpring, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04312
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lavery
Defendant:
SharpSpring, Inc., Richard A. Carlson, Steven A. Huey and others
Ahmed v. SharpSpring, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06494
Plaintiff:
Sameer Ahmed
Defendant:
SharpSpring, Inc., Richard Carlson, Steven A. Huey and others
Kaczmar v. SharpSpring, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06227
Plaintiff:
Don Kaczmar
Defendant:
SharpSpring, Inc., Richard A. Carlson, Steven A. Huey and others
Miller v. Capital Management Services, LP
as 1:2021cv00430
Plaintiff:
Scott Miller
Defendant:
Capital Management Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
United States of America v. Romano (Joseph Romano)
as 19-3815
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Romano
Defendant:
Thomas Arnold, AKA Tom Olsen, AKA Phil Kennedy, AKA Bill Regan, Kevin Wells, Russell Barnes, AKA Rusty, AKA Russ and others
United States of America v. Romano (Vincent Romano)
as 19-3573
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Arnold, AKA Tom Olsen, AKA Phil Kennedy, AKA Bill Regan, Kevin Wells, Joseph Romano and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Vincent Romano
United States of America v. Romano (Wells)
as 19-3507
Defendant / Appellant:
Kevin Wells and Vincent Romano
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Arnold, AKA Tom Olsen, AKA Phil Kennedy, AKA Bill Regan, Joseph Romano, Russell Barnes, AKA Rusty, AKA Russ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
