Cases 1 - 10 of 542
United States of America v. Rodriguez Tapia
as 24-1245
Defendant:
ALEX SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ TAPIA, NERLYN LUIS BAQUE VILLAFUERTE, JUAN CARLOS LOPEZ LASA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sanchez-Portillo v. Garland
as 24-1117
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN SANCHEZ-PORTILLO, KAREN YANES-SANTOS, ZOE MATUTE-YANES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dumaguala-Ortuno v. Garland
as 24-932
Petitioner:
WALTER DUMAGUALA-ORTUNO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Allen v. Civil Rights Coordinator
as 24-861
Plaintiff:
WALTER LOUIS ALLEN
Defendant:
CIVIL RIGHTS COORDINATOR, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, Region 2 and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Church Street Station
Cohen v. Tepper et al
as 2:2024cv02460
Plaintiff:
Martin Leonard Cohen
Defendant:
Stanley H. Tepper, Alan R. Tepper, Walter A. Koprowski and others
Interested Party:
US Attorney for the E. District of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
United States of America v. Reid (Soto)
as 24-647
Defendant:
CASWELL SENIOR, DWIGHT REID, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Watts v. Brito
as 24-451
Plaintiff:
CARLYN WATTS
Defendant:
INGRID BRITO, JOSHUA WALTERS, Attorney, N.Y.C.H.A. SUPERVISOR and others
Lemm, Jr. v. New York Community Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Lemm, Jr.
Defendant:
New York Community Bancorp, Inc., Thomas R. Cangemi and John J. Pinto
Demarest v. Town of Underhill
as 24-147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID P. DEMAREST
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF UNDERHILL, a municipality and charter town, DANIEL STEINABAUER, as an individual and in official capacity as Selectboard Chair, BOB STONE, as an individual and in official capacity and others
Walters v. Healthfirst, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jemimah Walters
Defendant:
Healthfirst, Inc. and Inovalon, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
