Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Petteway v. Connecticut Department of Corrections
as 23-8047
Plaintiff:
TAVERAS, Garner CI, CHRISTOPHER DEVEAU, ISAIAH BONEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER Q. PETTEWAY
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Which includes, but may not be limited to The Conn State Department Public Health; Securs TECH. Inc; Unity Products, LLC; The United States Post Office Post Master Gomaps, CRAIG WASHINGTON, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, ANGEL QUIROS, Commissioner of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Davis v. Taylor
as 21-2480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Scott Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Ava Taylor, PHD, Ronda Ferguson-Agustos, New York State Mental Hygiene Legal Service and others
Davis v. Taylor
as 20-3075
Defendant / Appellee:
Attorney Richard Doe, Jane Doe, Dr. Ava Taylor, PHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Scott Davis
Williams Scott & Associates, L v. United States of America
as 20-347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John T. Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
WSA, LLC and Williams Scott & Associates, LLC
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lawler et al
as 1:2019cv04025
Defendant:
Natalie Bannister and William Scott Lawler
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
United States of America v. Williams Scott (Williams)
as 16-4186
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Williams Scott & Associates, LLC, AKA WSA, AKA Warrant Services Association, Benita Cannedy, AKA Sharon Wright, Arthur Cook, AKA Ace Rogers and others
Defendant - Appellant:
John Todd Williams
Dish Network LLC et al v. Scott
as 1:2011cv00500
Plaintiff:
Dish Network LLC , Echostar Technologies LLC and Nagrastar LLC
Defendant:
William Scott
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 1203
United States of America v. Scott
as 10-3978
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
William Scott, AKA William Boone
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
