Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 0.01 Acres and Temporary Easement fpr 0.04 Acres in Sanford, Broome County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 201.04-1-19 et al
as 3:2014cv02096
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 0.01 Acres and Temporary Easement fpr 0.04 Acres in Sanford, Broome County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 201.04-1-19, Elizabeth D. Phillips, XTO Energy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 0.58 Acres and Temporary Easement for 0.65 Acres in Sanford, Broome County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 103.00-2-7 et al
as 3:2014cv02082
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 0.58 Acres and Temporary Easement for 0.65 Acres in Sanford, Broome County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 103.00-2-7, Haywell Farms, L.L.C., XTO Energy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 3.28 Acres, Permanent Access Easment for 0.21 Acres and Temporary Easments for 3.94 Acres in Sanford, Broome County, New York, Tax Parcel number 217.03-1-8 et al
as 3:2014cv02056
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 3.28 Acres, Permanent Access Easement for 0.21 Acres and Temporary Easements for 3.94 Acres in Sanford, Broome County, New York, Tax Parcel number 217.03-1-8, Elisabetta Iaboni, Bluestone Gas Corporation of New York, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 2.12 Acres and a Temporary Easement for 2.55 Acres, in Sanford, Broome County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 138.00-1-11.2 et al
as 3:2014cv02043
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 2.12 Acres and a Temporary Easement for 2.55 Acres, in Sanford, Broome County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 138.00-1-11.2, Jean Diamantis-Blizot, Diana Modica and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 0.08 Acres And a Temporary Easement for 0.03 Acres, In Sanford, Broome County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 086.00-1-28 et al
as 3:2014cv02029
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 0.08 Acres And a Temporary Easement for 0.03 Acres, In Sanford, Broome County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 086.00-1-28, Mathew Gorecki, III and All Unknown Owners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 3.76 Acres and Temporary Easements for 4.91 Acres, in Sanford, Broome County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 186.00-1-1 et al
as 3:2014cv02005
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 3.76 Acres and Temporary Easements for 4.91 Acres, in Sanford, Broome County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 186.00-1-1, Victoria M. Cempa, XTO Energy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Planavsky v. Broome County et al
as 3:2012cv01030
Plaintiff:
Danny R. Planavsky
Defendant:
Broome County , Debra A. Preston , Kevin P. Keough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Cawley
as 10-5304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Dillard Jones, DBA Family Charter Realty Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph F. Cawley, Broome County Justice, Mary Ann Lehman, Binghamton City Court Justice, Andrew M. Cuomo, New York State Attorney General and others
Northern Broome Association v. Enervest, Limited et al
as 3:2010cv00794
Plaintiff:
Northern Broome Association
Defendant:
Enervest, Limited and Belden & Blake Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jones v. Cawley et al
as 3:2010cv00712
Plaintiff:
Robert Dillard Jones
Defendant:
Joseph F. Cawley, Mary Ann Lehman, Andrew M. Cuomo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
