Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Hart et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12353
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hoffman, Eslyn Jeffrey, Frederick Jimenez and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Irizarry v. Carbone
as 3:2016cv01289
Plaintiff:
Luis Irizarry
Defendant:
Oreste Carbone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irizarry v. Infinity Elevator Company, Inc.
as 7:2014cv06966
Plaintiff:
Dale Irizarry
Defendant:
Infinity Elevator Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ke et al v. Irizarry et al
as 1:2014cv03423
Plaintiff:
Ran Ke and Shao-Ying Su
Defendant:
Jorge Irizarry , Kaj Transport Corp. and CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Irizarry v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01708
Plaintiff:
Adam Irizarry
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adames et al v. G.B. Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00569
Plaintiff:
Jose Adames and Sally Irizarry
Defendant:
G.B. Restaurants, Inc. and Top Line Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronan v. Naben
as 11-1432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephen Ronan
Third-Party-Defendant:
Walter Irizarry
Defendant - Appellee:
Thamer Naben
Irizarry et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2010cv01489
Plaintiff:
Thomas Irizarry and Lydia Irizarry
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1903 Petition to enforce administrative summon
Irizarry et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03656
Plaintiff:
Zoilo Irizarry and Janis Irizarry
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ronan v. Naben
as 7:2009cv07204
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ronan
Defendant:
Thamer Naben
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Thamer Naben
Thirdparty_defendant:
Walter Irizarry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
