Cases 31 - 40 of 191
Perez v. Smith
as 1:2019cv04231
Defendant:
Walter Smith
Plaintiff:
Walter Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chow v. SentosaCare, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03541
Plaintiff:
Walter Chow
Defendant:
Leah Friedman, deena landra, Does 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Perez v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv02085
Plaintiff:
Barclay Water Management, Inc., Walter Perez and Paul Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Doner v. Long Island Rail Road Company
as 2:2019cv01752
Plaintiff:
Walter Doner
Defendant:
Long Island Rail Road Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Winiarczyk et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv00262
Plaintiff:
Karol L Winiarczyk and Walter M Winiarczyk
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weber et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Weber and Walter Weber
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adedapo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2019cv00040
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clarino, John Colella, Steven Steigelfest and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Figuereo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12369
Plaintiff:
Ernest Velez, Anthony Valentino, Anthony J Yacopino and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Latchman et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12354
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Lipscomb, Joycelyn Lee, John Manchester and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Keaton et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12326
Plaintiff:
KAREN KEATON, Magali Colon, Josephine Kopik and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
