Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Jane Doe 200 v. Indyke et al
as 1:2024cv04775
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 200
Defendant:
Richard D. Kahn and Darren K. Indyke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Jane Doe 3 v. Indyke et al
as 1:2024cv02192
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 3
Defendant:
Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Coursey et al v. Exactech Inc et al
as 1:2023cv08113
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Coursey and Darren Coursey
Defendant:
Exactech Inc and Exactech U.S. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Slocum et al v. UNFI Transport, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Katherine Slocum and Matthew Slocum
Defendant:
UNFI Transport, LLC, United Natural Foods, Inc. and Darren A. Angus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Martinez v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv00849
Plaintiff:
Darren Martinez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, United States of America and Philip Tonning O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Gutierrez Hernandez v. Tuck et al
as 7:2022cv05242
Plaintiff:
Luis Carlos Gutierrez Hernandez
Defendant:
Darren Tuck, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Sherry, Jr. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 1:2021cv01227
Plaintiff:
Darren J. Sherry, Jr.
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Doe v. Indyke et al
as 1:2021cv03876
Defendant:
Darren K Indyke and Richard D. Kahn
Plaintiff:
Lola Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe XXI v. Indyke et al
as 1:2020cv11110
Defendant:
Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe XXI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe XX v. Indyke et al
as 1:2020cv11106
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe XX
Defendant:
Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
