Cases 11 - 20 of 20
MSN Air Services, Inc. et al v. Port Authority New York and New Jersey et al
as 1:2014cv01066
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-10, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Donald Rivas and others
Plaintiff:
MSN Air Service, Inc. and Rudy Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv05977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01204
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv09582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv01794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joseph v. Northwood Group, LLc; et al
as 1:2008cv03644
Plaintiff:
Marie Chantale Joseph
Cross_defendant:
XYZ Corporation and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Joseph v. Northwood Group, LLc; et al
as 7:2008cv03644
Plaintiff:
Marie Chantale Joseph and Marie Chantale Joseph
Defendant:
Northwood Group, LLc;, Century 21 Wolff & Son Business Brokers INC;, Fremont Investment and Loan; and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv09924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
