Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Watkins v. US Gov. Congress et al
as 1:2016cv04224
Plaintiff:
Clover J. Watkins
Defendant:
US Gov. Congress, Jamaica Parliament, Sony Electronic of Japan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Watkins-El v. Department of Education et al
as 1:2016cv02256
Defendant:
Administration of Children Services, Adrian Edwards, Amirita Harbajan and others
DOE:
Department of Education
Plaintiff:
Richard Watkins-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson et al v. US Government et al
as 1:2016cv02707
Plaintiff:
Clover J. Robinson and Clover J. Watkins
Defendant:
US Government, Jamaica Government, Sony Electronic Japan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watkins v. Village of Mastic Beach et al
as 2:2016cv01434
In His Individual Capacity 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Pursuant To 42:
Bruce Summa
Defendant:
Village of Mastic Beach
Plaintiff:
Debbie Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Dow Jones Industries et al
as 1:2016cv00288
Plaintiff:
Clover J. Watkins
Defendant:
Dow Jones Industries, Dept. of Justice, Sony Electronic of Japan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Watkins v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv08108
Plaintiff:
Khadijah Watkins
Defendant:
The City of New York, Michael Callahan, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Doe et al
as 1:2014cv07504
Plaintiff:
Nikita Watkins
Defendant:
John Doe and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
