Cases 31 - 40 of 207
Simmon v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00410
Defendant:
Police Officer Yangwu Chen, City of New York, Michael Franco and others
Plaintiff:
Servisio Simmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pressley v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06636
Defendant:
City of New York and Officers John Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Dequann Pressley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fourcand v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06146
Defendant:
City of New York and John Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Ronald Fourcand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rivera v. City Of New York ; et al
as 1:2015cv07378
Plaintiff:
Eddie Rivera
Defendant:
City of New York and John Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covington v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv05329
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe 1 through 10 and Police Officer Waliur Rahman
Plaintiff:
Maurice Covington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fonville v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv05178
Defendant:
City of New York and NYPD Officers John Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Khaleef Fonville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Szalega v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06655
Plaintiff:
Piotr Szalega
Defendant:
City of New York and NYPD Officers John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McLaurin v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06450
Plaintiff:
Anthony McLaurin
Defendant:
City of New York and John Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06246
Plaintiff:
Daemel Anderson
Defendant:
City of New York and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wong v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06229
Plaintiff:
Laurence Wong
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Police Department, Undercover C0303 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
