Cases 81 - 90 of 178
Xie v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv06485
Plaintiff:
Agnes Xie
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Furniture Contractor of J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Furniture Manufacture of J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strujan v. Fiden & Norris, LLP et al
as 1:2016cv04365
Defendant:
Giustizia Agressivo, Amazon Pharmacy Inc., American Online Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Strujan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2016cv06195
Plaintiff:
Guy Harris
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02774
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holt v. Federal National Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03937
Plaintiff:
Richard Holt
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Corporation, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caires v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 1:2016cv02694
Plaintiff:
Richard Caires
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sagar v. Stone et al
as 1:2016cv01048
Plaintiff:
Paul Pallaseri Vidya Sagar
Defendant:
Rebecca A. Stone, Eric Schatz, Scot Dincklocker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chateau v. American Government et al
as 1:2016cv02183
Plaintiff:
Marie Chateau
Defendant:
American Government, Hillary Clinton, Chealsea Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parsons v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
as 1:2016cv00408
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00474
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
