Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Copeland v. Goodwin
as 1:2024cv04361
Plaintiff:
Xaleta Copeland
Defendant:
Paul Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Goodwin v. Monroe County Department of Human Services et al
as 6:2024cv06020
Plaintiff:
Daryl Goodwin and Armani D. Goodwin
Defendant:
Monroe County Department of Human Services, Lynn White, Supv Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodwine v. Government
as 1:2021cv04238
Plaintiff:
Earl Goodwine
Defendant:
Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Town of Webster et al
as 6:2021cv06233
Defendant:
Stephanie Reusch, Assistant Principal Jacqueline Goodwine, Webster Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Kali Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwine v. Amtrack
as 1:2019cv02599
Defendant:
Amtrack
Plaintiff:
Earl Goodwine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
Slater et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv05861
Plaintiff:
Shawkise Goodwin, Stuvon Gethers, Jamie Wilkins and others
Defendant:
Miguel Frias, Matthew Mozdziak, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Spring Valley Branch et al v. East Ramapo Central School District et al
as 7:2017cv08943
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Spring Valley Branch , Julio Clerveaux , Chevon Dos Reis and others
Defendant:
East Ramapo Central School District and MaryEllen Elia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv06716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
