Cases 101 - 110 of 525
Brown v. Dunbar et al
as 1:2019cv06421
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York and Warden Sherma Dunbar
Petitioner:
Arthur Lamar Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Sorodsky v. Keyser et al
as 1:2019cv05389
Petitioner:
MICHAIL SORODSKY
Respondent:
Wende Correctional Facility, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Woodbourne Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Bryant v. People Of The State Of New York
as 7:2019cv04405
Petitioner:
Tony Bryant
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vega v. The People of The State of New York
as 6:2019cv06322
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Petitioner:
Jesus Vega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. People Of The State Of New York
as 1:2019cv02571
Petitioner:
Tony Bryant
Respondent:
People Of The State Of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Criss v. People of the State of New York
as 1:2019cv00340
Petitioner:
Isaiah T. Criss
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kravchina v. People of the State of New York
as 1:2019cv01279
Petitioner:
Roman Kravchina
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01149
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn
Watson v. The People of the State of New York
as 1:2019cv00707
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Petitioner:
Joseph Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sukhu v. The People of The State of New York
as 1:2019cv00410
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Petitioner:
James Sukhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
