Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Taylor v. Ridley et al
as 2:2010cv05655
Defendant:
P.O. James Johnson, P.O. Leroy Ridley and Town of Hempstead
Plaintiff:
Trent Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Fisher et al
as 1:2009cv09496
Plaintiff:
Trent Patterson
Defendant:
Brian Fisher, N.Y.S. Department of Corrections, Medical Staff of Attica Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orbaker v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00008
Petitioner:
Trent D. Orbaker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Patterson v. Kelly et al
as 1:2008cv08542
Plaintiff:
Trent Patterson
Defendant:
Raymond Kelly, Hollywood and Herzog
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Patterson v. Commissioner of Dept. of Corr. et al
as 1:2008cv01612
Plaintiff:
Trent Patterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Dept. of Corr., Warden of C-73, Deputy Superintendent of Security (C-73) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Commissioner of Corections et al
as 1:2007cv08057
Plaintiff:
Trent Patterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Corections, Deputy Superintendent of Security AMKC, Captain of Security AMK (C-95) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Commissioner of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv07259
Plaintiff:
Trent Patterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Corrections, Riordan, Deputy Superintendent of Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Ercole
as 1:2007cv01209
Petitioner:
Trent Taylor and Trent Taylor
Respondent:
Robert Ercole, Robert Ercole and Robert Ercole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Ercole
as 1:2007cv01879
Petitioner:
Trent Taylor
Respondent:
Robert Ercole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
