Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Luevano V Clinton
as 2:2008cv01360
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Danny Anchondo, Silvestre Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Guy v. John Doe et al
as 1:2008cv03034
Plaintiff:
Antonio Guy
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Guy v. John Doe et al
as 1:2008cv03038
Plaintiff:
Antonio Guy
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Krebs v. Spitzer et al
as 9:2008cv00255
Plaintiff:
Larry Krebs
Defendant:
Elliot Spitzer, George Alexander, George E. Pataki and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Levites v. Commissioner of the New York State Division Parole et al
as 1:2008cv00113
Petitioner:
Roman Levites
Respondent:
Commissioner of the New York State Division Parole, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services and Elliot Spitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kattan v. Killian
as 7:2007cv11605
Petitioner:
Elliot Kattan
Respondent:
J.M. Killian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dixon v. Fischer et al
as 9:2007cv01157
Plaintiff:
Echo Dixon
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, William Lape, D. Martuscello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. N.Y.C. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv08390
Plaintiff:
Oneil Edwards
Defendant:
N.Y.C. Dept. of Corrections, Bronx Supreme Court, Unnamed Officer in his individual capacity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawthorne v. Spitzer
as 1:2007cv04128
Petitioner:
Rudolph Hawthorne
Respondent:
Elliot Spitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pacheco v. Pataki et al
as 9:2007cv00850
Plaintiff:
Milton Musa Pacheco
Defendant:
George E. Pataki, Elliot Spitzer, Anthony Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
