Cases 51 - 60 of 263
Pizarro v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv04412
Plaintiff:
Jose Pizarro
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, N.Y.C. H.M.H., Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walrond v. NYCDOC MDC et al
as 1:2017cv03535
Defendant:
Warden NYCDOC MDC and NYCDOC Commissioner Joseph Ponte
Plaintiff:
Jade Walrond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv04269
Plaintiff:
Curtis Nichols, Avery Fortner, Wesley Johnson and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, K. Smalls, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv04071
Plaintiff:
Curtis Nichols, Avery Fortner, Wesley Johnson and others
Defendant:
Comm. Joseph Ponte, EMTC Warden Keisha Smalls, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leach v. New York City Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv03972
Plaintiff:
Monte S. Leach
Defendant:
New York City Dept. of Corrections and Joseph Ponte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv03874
Plaintiff:
Stanley Holmes
Defendant:
The City of New York, Joseph Ponte, Mingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv03486
Plaintiff:
Curtis R. Nichols
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Corizon Health & Hospital Corporations, A. Blackmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv03449
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, John/Jane Doe and Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv03346
Plaintiff:
Damon Townsend
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, V.C.B.C. Warden John/Jane Doe, Deputy Warden Security John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. The New York City Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv03250
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmes
Defendant:
The New York City Dept of Corrections, Joseph Ponte, Mingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
