Cases 51 - 60 of 184
Martin v. Smith
as 13-579
Petitioner - Appellant:
Sylvan Martin
Respondent - Appellee:
Joseph T. Smith, Superintendent
Freeman v. Smith
as 2:2013cv00794
Petitioner:
Eric Freeman
Respondent:
Joseph T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivers v. Smith
as 1:2013cv00549
Petitioner:
Sherman Rivers
Respondent:
Superintendent Joseph T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cromwell v. Smith
as 1:2013cv00029
Petitioner:
Jarvis Cromwell
Respondent:
Joseph T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford v. Smith
as 1:2012cv08993
Petitioner:
Corey Ford
Respondent:
Joseph T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford v. Smith
as 7:2012cv08993
Petitioner:
Corey Ford
Respondent:
Joseph T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Smith
as 12-4729
Petitioner - Appellant:
Maurice Brown
Respondent - Appellee:
Joseph T. Smith, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility
Shelton v. Smith
as 12-4504
Petitioner - Appellant:
Donnell Shelton
Respondent - Appellee:
Joseph T. Smith, Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility
Ford v. Fischer
as 12-4193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Corey Ford
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian Fischer, Commissioner, DOCS, Joseph T. Smith, First Deputy Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility, John Maly, Deputy Superintendent of Security, Shawagunk Correctional Facility and others
Ford v. Smith
as 12-4212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Corey Ford
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph T. Smith, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility; sued in individual and official capacity, C.O. Palmer, Correctional Officer; Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Law, Correctional Officer/Security Staff Employee, Shawangunk Correctional Facility; sued in individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
