Cases 61 - 70 of 1,955
Smith v. Orange County et al
as 7:2023cv08211
Plaintiff:
Paul Smith
Defendant:
Orange County, Carl E. DuBois, Orange County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. People of the State of New York et al
as 6:2023cv06526
Plaintiff:
Tasheam E. Jackson
Defendant:
People of the State of New York, District Attorney's Office of Chemung, Susan Rider-Ulacco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rizzuto v. Melecio et al
as 9:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Rizzuto
Defendant:
Phil Melecio, John J. Morley, Vincent E. Brugger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Sergent Reid et al
as 1:2023cv06667
Plaintiff:
Abderanman Mayo
Defendant:
Sergent Reid, Sergent Carrington, M. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggs v. Hill
as 1:2023cv06634
Petitioner:
Andre E. Biggs
Respondent:
Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lettieri v. Bonanno et al
as 6:2023cv06515
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Paul E. Bonanno and Lawrence Joseph Vilardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slivienski v. Corey
as 9:2023cv01127
Petitioner:
Thomas Slivienski
Respondent:
Joseph E. Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Wyoming County Jail
as 6:2023cv06491
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Richardson
Defendant:
Wyoming County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. Lowerre
as 9:2023cv01015
Petitioner:
Nailon Blair
Respondent:
E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucas v. Uhler et al
as 9:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
London Lucas
Defendant:
D. Uhler, J. Messenger, R. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
