Cases 61 - 70 of 63,242
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Janczuk v. Federal Trade Commission et al
as 1:2024cv03716
Plaintiff:
Weronika Janczuk
Defendant:
Federal Trade Commission, Experian, TransUnion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murgio v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03650
Petitioner:
Anthony R. Murgio
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Janczuk v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03661
Plaintiff:
Weronika E.K. Janczuk
Defendant:
United States of America, The Marshals of the USA and The Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. State Of New York
as 1:2024cv03358
Petitioner:
Stephon Edwards
Respondent:
State Of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duchnowski et al v. LaRusso et al
as 2:2024cv03433
Plaintiff:
Leo Duchnowski
Defendant:
Anthony LaRusso, Dr. Donna Henig, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeFreitas v. Toulon Jr.
as 2:2024cv03394
Petitioner:
Russell DeFreitas
Respondent:
Errol D. Toulon Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Malave v. Price et al
as 1:2024cv03539
Plaintiff:
Rafaela A. Malave
Defendant:
Detective Ryan Price and Judge Robert A. Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03598
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Yung v. People of New York
as 1:2024cv03605
Plaintiff:
John Yung
Defendant:
People of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
