Cases 1 - 10 of 50,146
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bazile v. Wolcott et al
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Kenny Bazile
Defendant:
Julie Wolcott, Donald Uhler, Mark Rockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams-Dorsey v. County of Chenango et al
as 9:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Davonte Williams-Dorsey
Defendant:
County of Chenango, Chenango County Sheriff's Office, Chenango County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mehalick v. Stowell et al
as 9:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Charles Mehalick
Defendant:
Correction Officer Stowell, Sergeant Hutchens, Correction Officer Leeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. People of the State of NY
as 9:2024cv00760
Petitioner:
Rajzhaun M. Rouse
Respondent:
People of the State of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrison v. Washington
as 9:2024cv00761
Petitioner:
William Morrison
Respondent:
M. Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jenkins v. Corey
as 9:2024cv00765
Petitioner:
Willie F. Jenkins
Respondent:
Joseph Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2024cv06366
Plaintiff:
James O. Young
Defendant:
Monroe County, Todd Baxter, Sgt. Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
